Whatever women do, men can too (or words without meaning)

Don’t laugh. It’s a serious issue.

Men are facing an unprecedented health crisis. And it appears to be contagious, spreading rapidly and is far more threatening to life as we know it than Ebola.

Men are getting pregnant.

And giving birth.

Medicare statistics show that the epicentre of this outbreak occurred in New South Wales in the 2012/2013 financial year. A male, aged between 25 and 34, is listed as receiving medical treatment for:

“Management of Labour and delivery by any means (including Caesarean section) including post-partum care for 5 days”

Considering that men don’t have the female anatomy to give birth by the normal process, I think the operative words of this procedure are ‘by any means’. The medical journals still have not defined exactly what this does mean for a man, so don’t expect me to shed any light on this issue here.

In the usual bureaucratic style, the phenomenon of male birth has been reduced to a number and it is 16519 on the Medicare Benefits Schedule, although it is by no means the only one that counts. Item 16515 is for the ‘Management of vaginal delivery’.

And guess what?

Medicare statistics show that men are capable of much more than just delivering a child ‘by any means’. Last year one gave birth the traditional way as well.

At this point one becomes rather embarrassed. Medicare has committed a social faux pas of the worst kind. The associated notes for procedure 16515 are soooooo discriminatory and gender presumptuous. They refer to the patient as ‘her’ or the ‘mother’ on three occasions.

Of course, the big question here is not how or why this has all happened. We all just want to know whether a man can handle the pain. Unfortunately, although the media usually love to cover the sensational, there has been no reporting at all about the fact that men are giving birth in Australia. So this question remains unanswered, but I’m guessing that men can match it in the labour ward as well as any woman.

The good news for the man at the centre of this outbreak of male pregnancy is that Medicare covered at least $520.50 of the $695.95 it cost for his medical care.

It really was a small price to pay to stem the contagion. But it clearly wasn’t enough.

Because in the 2013/2014 financial year the epidemic spread. And it did so widely and rapidly.

Over this period, 16 men gave birth in New South Wales. There were 7 male births in Victoria and another 6 in Queensland. Men also contracted pregnancy in South Australia and Tasmania. Blokes over in Western Australia were hit particularly hard, with 22 requiring medical intervention to manage their labour.

In total, 54 men gave birth by any means in the 2013/2014 financial year. The vast majority were over 24, with one even listed as aged between 55 and 64.

Right across Australia fathers are becoming mothers. In fact, in the last 12 months the number of men becoming pregnant has increased by a whopping 5400 per cent.

By my calculations, if male pregnancies continue growing at this rate, by about September next year there will be more blokes giving birth than sheilas.

This is rather concerning for many reasons, not least of all because the statistics show that father mothers are not looking after themselves. Medicare might list 54 male births in 2012/2013, but it only lists a single ‘six week postnatal attendance’ for a male in the same period. Given the fact that male births are an unprecedented medical anomaly, one would have thought that postnatal care was of paramount importance.

But putting aside the health issues, there are other important questions to answer. For instance, will a father who becomes a mother be entitled to maternity leave? And how does a father become a mother anyway?

I think this is definitely one explanation that does require a diagram, although I’m not sure anyone can actually draw one that is meaningful in any sense of the word.

Of course, these figures don’t take into account the fact that not all male pregnancies result in an actual baby.

About half of them are terminated. It seems that abortion is no longer purely a women’s issue. Men have a legitimate voice too. So to all the alleged ladies out there who keep demanding that men stay out of this, I have three words for you: don’t be sexist.

And you can all stop with your silly chanting about rosaries and ovaries. I’ve got a better one: how dare you assume that men have no womb.

Last financial year there were 44 cases where men underwent a procedure numbered 35643 by Medicare:

Evacuation of the contents of the gravid uterus by curettage or suction curettage”

For those who don’t know, the Dorland’s Medical Dictionary for Health Consumers defines ‘gravid uterus’ as ‘one containing a developing foetus’. Unfortunately, its definition of uterus as a ‘hollow muscular organ in female mammals’ is way off.

Men have uteruses too, and it’s about time that the anti-discrimination boards across the nation stepped in and demanded changes to all school biology textbooks. They are obviously way out of date and have not been able to keep up with the ‘settled science’, or whatever the term is used these days to mean ‘absolute bunkum’.

Unfortunately, it does seem clear that the words ‘man’, ‘woman’, ‘mother’ and ‘father’ are all so 2012.

Now don’t worry if none of this makes any sense to you. It doesn’t make any sense to anyone. We’ve evolved to the point where words are no longer meaningful or needed. Progress now means that a bunch of monkeys grunting in the jungle actually make more sense than modern users of the English language.

Welcome to the brave new world of 2014.

Males Births Males Abortions

Thank you for your help



Thank you for your support, encouragement, assistance and generosity this year. Without it, this webpage would not have been able to continue operation and nor would we have been able to achieve great success in 2015. And it truly has been a year of success in the face of adversity.


We have managed to secure an important win for free speech by limiting the operation of state-based anti-discrimination laws. However, this decision has been challenged and an appeal will be heard in the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal on 1 April, 2016.


You can read more about the abusive behaviour of serial litigant and anti-free speech activist, Gary Burns, and this entire saga here.


More importantly, we have secured a great win for free speech against a politicised Australian Defence Force in the Federal Court. You can read about this win here and the background to it here.


Unfortunately, the Australian Defence Force continues to interfere in domestic political activity and is now attacking the Australian Liberty Alliance from official Twitter accounts.


Additionally, this webpage has provided huge assistance to the fight against halal certification, led by Kirralie Smith. Over 8,000 Australians signed the submission opposing halal certification that I lodged with the Senate earlier this year. This entire industry now rests on very shaky ground: it has been primed for a knock out blow.


These campaigns are expensive and ongoing. I would appreciate any financial assistance that you may be able to provide.


Family Values Action A/c (legal fighting fund)

  • - BSB: 084 134
  • - A/c No: 39 446 4501

Gaynor Family Support A/c (keeps this website going and feeds my family while I fight)

  • - BSB: 084 134
  • - A/c No: 84 082 9276

Paypal: Click here


Cheque/Money Order: PO Box 766, Park Ridge, Qld 4125


Finally, I thank you for your encouragement and support. It has convinced me not only to run with the Australian Liberty Alliance as a Senate candidate but, more importantly, that there is a growing army of Australians ready to take action in a coordinated and successful fashion. Watch out for the Australian Liberty Alliance in 2016!


Author: Bernard Gaynor

Share This Post On

11 Comments

  1. So, Bernard, being a 21st century bloke, are you having your next baby or will your wife have to do it AGAIN??? :)
    Keep up the great posts.

    Post a Reply
    • Thanks for your comment. Unfortunately, I don’t think I am as brave as my wife and I could never be as good a mother as she is!

      Post a Reply
  2. Seriously though, is this data on female to male transexuals, or what?

    Post a Reply
  3. The problem is that the government is now collecting gender data instead of sex data. There are three types, male, female and undertermined…take your pic :-)

    Post a Reply
  4. Thanks, Bernard — Wow, this is really crackers stuff. What on earth is going on???? Where is the sanity??? The far Left are making a mockery of what it is to be human.

    Post a Reply
  5. And I DO NOT want to know who or how these “males” are being impregnated.

    Post a Reply
  6. Casting my mind back only 20 short years ago, this scenario was considered comedic, ficticious and farcical (think Arnold Schwarzenegger in Junior). Now it’s just farcical.

    These poor kids…

    Post a Reply
  7. Bernard I love your blogs, makes me realize someone else out there is sane LOl

    Post a Reply
  8. Stan (Loretta) will be pleased—

    Stan: It’s every man’s right to have babies if he wants them.
    Reg: But … you can’t HAVE babies!
    Stan: Don’t you oppress me!

    Post a Reply
  9. And people sneered when the more intelligent amongst us said ‘slippery slope’. Shame, shame on Medicare. God made them Men and Women, that’s it.

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Pin It on Pinterest

Shares

Share This

Share this post with your friends!